Leaderboard

I was having issues with anadrol a couple years ago, stopped the cycle and haven't used drol since. Priorities I guess.

Someone once told me that if your grandfather went bald you may as well. As though balding skips a generation, does anyone know if this is true cause my dad is in his 70's and still has quite a bit of hair, mine has been thinning alot last couple years. My grandfather on my dad's side died when I was a kid but I remember he was bald.

Quick little update. Going into week 5 of 12 test-e 750mg and mast-e 600mg and looking drier and tighter havent run test above 400mg a week for about 2 years now. Feeling good, smooth pins, flows through 25g with ease. Libido way up the beginning of this week

Take an AI as needed. If water retention gets out of control or other higher estrogenic sides then add it in, and honestly just jumping back in and going to a dose where you require an AI would be too much in my opinion, start lower. I've said this quite a bit I feel lol BUT estrogen is a very crucial part when it comes to growing - we want to be able to maximize the amount of estrogen we can handle. Most guys take AI's unnecessarily and drive their estrogen too low without realizing, thus limiting their ability to grow. So I'd certainly have it on hand but use it when necessary.

Does male pattern baldness run in your family? If so, sorry to say nearly any AAS will simply speed the process up. Personally, it runs in my family so once I accepted it I moved on and didn't care otherwise lol And I'd actually say it was probably a little bit of both the test as well as the tren. Anything mildly androgenic can cause hair loss.

Personally, I’d just keep going as planned. Baldness runs in my family, I knew it was gonna be a thing with or without AAS. And I was well warned that gear would speed it up, so it never really bothered me. I’ve been shaving my head for a while now. Looks good. now don’t get me wrong, hair would be tits, but not gonna get upset over something I can’t change. Just my genetic card to play. So I’d just focus on bodybuilding goals and the best way to get there. But that’s just me.

Personally, I think it adds validity to the study. Adding in strength training would add a number of uncontrollable variables that could effect overall results. For example, training intensity, form, trained vs untrained, etc... I like how they approached this, as its merely looking at the drug itself and what dose would correspond with FFM. Now I also think this is an area I would love to see developed, but ethically I don't think we'll see too many studies delve into the bodybuilding world of abuse lol.

@BobTheOldLifter Cool let us know how the gear works for ya.

I would like to report that I have become a new deus customer. Service was nothing short of perfect. Very timely response to questions, and good advice received. If the product is as good as the service, I'll be a very happy customer. I'll definitely report further if I have anything to report, but so far - excellent. Reflecting on the photo below, I wonder who this is really for, myself or my wife

It's not just you man, I love to smash that guy and get away with it. I never really HATED him until he started giving terrorists 10million paydays.

So this guy can post up his products here and solicit members through PM while we have sponsors on this board???

I think volume is important however I think that content is equally as important. I don't think anyone here would take issue with you folks deciding on the over-all merit of posts ie if someone posts a question and then someone else posts a relevant answer, the quality of that answer should weigh in maybe even more than the count of 1 you get for posting it. Like someone asks "What's the best way to boost NO pre-workout" and someone responds "Have you tried Arginine?". Someone else responds 'Well you should try Agmatine, at X dose and try taking it x minutes before work-out and stack it with x and y and if you aren't seeing the results you want boost the dose to here safely etc etc" you get the idea. I think that answer should be weighed more heavily in addition to the credit for the volume count. Some people can attend the board more than others so in this way the ones with less time to attend the board won't necessarily get punished in their chances to win a prize. If the quality of their content makes up a lot for a lower quantity then I think reward for that is good but you guys will have to decide the ratio/merit etc. Also, rewarding the quality of the posts will only benefit the quality of the board by perhaps instilling a sense of actually writing better content every time you post, and definitely not saying there is any issue in that area but any benefit will always be good/better for the community over-all. You definitely don't want people being overly verbose just for the sake of it, and some of us will yak your ear off given an opportunity ( looking in the mirror here lol) but again, that will be for the mgmt to decide where the sweet spot is in any given post etc. Anyway, as a really new guy here I'm slowly working my way through the already posted content and trying to post in where I can contribute something of value but what I have seen so far is a lot of really good content. I think the contest will only make that better, and a little bit of friendly competition driving folks, now and again, is always a good thing IMHO. Cheers

It's a good thing to take this stuff seriously. I was never planning on running his gear because he has very little in the way of reviews vs other labs. The only labs from that forum I'd be interested in are Pareto or PG since their offerings seem to be able to be backed up, and not just on that forum, on others as well. I don't take the word of one forum by itself as it's obvious on some forum which labs are over pumped. It's surprising to me how many people are willing to Inject anything they can get their hands on without doing much research. But hey, to each their own. Everybody is responsible for their own body I guess.