Coconut Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 Would love to hear from everyone, that has used both forms of winny. What's your preferences? Pros vs Cons? As I get old 50plus, everyday injections gets old very fast. I like injectable winny, and I know it's better than oral, but if you have proper protection for your liver support is oral any better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaskedMisery Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 Personally I really like oral winny. As you said it's one less injection to do + the injectable version of the winny is still toxic to the liver, both are 17C-AA and both are liver toxic. so why complicate things? I really like Winny, it's one of my preferred AAS. I usually don't take it more than 5 weeks and get bloodwork regularly to make sure the liver is doing fine! Also right now I am taking a low dose deca to make sure my joints are fine on winny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconut Posted January 22, 2020 Author Share Posted January 22, 2020 2 hours ago, MaskedMisery said: Personally I really like oral winny. As you said it's one less injection to do + the injectable version of the winny is still toxic to the liver, both are 17C-AA and both are liver toxic. so why complicate things? I really like Winny, it's one of my preferred AAS. I usually don't take it more than 5 weeks and get bloodwork regularly to make sure the liver is doing fine! Also right now I am taking a low dose deca to make sure my joints are fine on winny. Thanks for your input. I am in the process of putting together my next cycle, looking at NPP + Test P @ 400/400 weekly with a dbol or dbol. Not sure if I want to throw in the winny yet. Any thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconut Posted January 22, 2020 Author Share Posted January 22, 2020 Correction - Just now, Coconut said: Thanks for your input. I am in the process of putting together my next cycle, looking at NPP + Test P @ 400/400 weekly with a dbol or dbol. Not sure if I want to throw in the winny yet. Any thoughts? Correction (dbol or tbol) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaskedMisery Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Coconut said: Thanks for your input. I am in the process of putting together my next cycle, looking at NPP + Test P @ 400/400 weekly with a dbol or dbol. Not sure if I want to throw in the winny yet. Any thoughts? Really depend what you are trying to achieve with this cycle? Are you trying to bulk or cut? I like winny as a cutting agent but it can still be used on a bulking cycle for strength gain. Also you will need to experiment but a 1:1 ratio of test/nandrolone is fine, but most people prefer a 2:1 ratio, which means double the test compare to nandrolone. Edited January 22, 2020 by MaskedMisery wording Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconut Posted January 22, 2020 Author Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 hour ago, MaskedMisery said: Really depend what you are trying to achieve with this cycle? Are you trying to bulk or cut? I like winny as a cutting agent but it can still be used on a bulking cycle for strength gain. Also you will need to experiment but a 1:1 ratio of test/nandrolone is fine, but most people prefer a 2:1 ratio, which means double the test compare to nandrolone. Looking at quality gains. I stay fairly lean thru out the year. Being 52 yrs old and 5'9" 180lbs 8% bf. I am done with the days of serious bulking. 2:1 ratio test/npp will definitely look into this. Winny would be for strength. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millenium girl Posted January 25, 2020 Share Posted January 25, 2020 I ran both and the results were equal. My butt thanked me for not injecting anymore ... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blitz Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 Winstrol competes with tren for my favorite secondary AAS. The results are the same with oral and inject. The inject is a real pain, having to shoot every day. Oral wins everytime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fizzyx Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 On 1/22/2020 at 9:59 AM, Coconut said: Looking at quality gains. I stay fairly lean thru out the year. Being 52 yrs old and 5'9" 180lbs 8% bf. I am done with the days of serious bulking. 2:1 ratio test/npp will definitely look into this. Winny would be for strength. Why the emphasis on strength beyond what the NPP and test would give? Competing or power lifting? Asking because I am of similar vintage and just don't feel the joint issues are worth it anymore and Winny is probably the worst for this. Also, being 17-AA it should not be used for longer durations making the strength benefits short lived. I would go without it but that is just me. Also, the 2:1 ratio is often recommend for those who are seriously concerned about nandrolone related ED issues. Not everyone get these, cabergoline will help if they arise (should have on hand when running 19-nor steroids), and NPP is a shorter ester so dosage changes take effect relatively quickly. Meaning, 1:1 may work fine for you if you want a more anabolic cycle and if not, you can switch it up fairly easily. Again, that is just me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.